<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Computer Tricks &#38; Tips &#187; Cloud computing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.touchupsoft.com/ComputerTricks/tag/cloud-computing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.touchupsoft.com/ComputerTricks</link>
	<description>Better Digital Life &#38; Saver</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 06:35:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Differences between MP3 and WMA</title>
		<link>http://www.touchupsoft.com/ComputerTricks/differences-between-mp3-and-wma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.touchupsoft.com/ComputerTricks/differences-between-mp3-and-wma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips & Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mp3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.touchupsoft.com/ComputerTricks/?p=288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comparison between MP3 and WMA]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span><a href="#Audio_quality"><span style="color: #0000ff; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline; font-size: 10pt; font-family: '宋体';">MP3</span></a></span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> is a very popular digital </span><span><a href="http://www.mp3do.com/mp3converter.html"><span style="color: #0000ff; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: underline; font-size: 10pt; font-family: '宋体';">audio coding</span></a></span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> and lossy compression format. Its full name is </span><span style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">Moving Picture Experts Group Audio Layer </span><span><span style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman';">III</span></span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">. It abandons some data of </span><span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCM"><span style="color: #0000ff; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline; font-size: 10pt; font-family: '宋体';">PCM</span></a></span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> audio data that is not important to human auditory system so as to decrease file size to the </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">maximum extent. There are a lot of technologies that are used in making MP3, including </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">applying psychoacoustics to make sure which part of audio files can be discarded. MP3 audio </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">can be compressed according to different bit rate, which provides a range to offset between </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">data size and sound quality. As a result, it greatly lower data size while the acoustic fidelity of files compressed is not worse than that of originals obviously, to most of users. </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">MP3 was invented and standardized by a group of engineers of Fraunhofer</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">Gesellschaft located in Erlangen, Germany in 1991.</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"><br />
</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: '宋体';">The Advantage of MP3</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: '宋体';"> </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">MP3 and WMA are two different kinds of music formats and many </span><span><a href="http://www.mp3do.com/"><span style="color: #0000ff; text-decoration: underline; font-size: 10pt; font-family: '宋体';">converting software</span></a></span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> can convert audio files of other formats to these two popular ones.</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-290" title="mp3 and wmv 1" src="http://www.touchupsoft.com/ComputerTricks/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/mp3-and-wmv-11.jpg" alt="mp3 and wmv 1" width="503" height="310" /></span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"><br />
</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-291" title="mp3 and wmv 2" src="http://www.touchupsoft.com/ComputerTricks/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/mp3-and-wmv-2.jpg" alt="mp3 and wmv 2" width="502" height="314" /></span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman';">128kbps</span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> of MP3  and </span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman';">64kbps</span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> of WMA</span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman';">128kbps</span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> of MP3  and </span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman';">96kbps</span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> of WMA</span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman';">128kbps</span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> of MP3  and   128</span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman';">kbps</span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> of WMA</span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman';">1</span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">60</span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman';">kbps</span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> of MP3  and   128</span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman';">kbps</span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> of WMA</span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman';">1</span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">92</span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman';">kbps</span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> of MP3  and </span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman';">1</span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">92</span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman';">kbps</span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> of WMA</span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">In terms of the former two ones, the acoustic fidelity of WMA is better than MP3 while </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">MP3 becomes better than WMA in the condition of the last two kinds of bit rate. But when </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">it turns to under the third circumstance, there is not big deference between MP3 and WMA. </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">That is because when the compression rate is above 128k, the quality of WMA do not improve </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">a bit but MP3 quality is upgraded a lot. </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"><br />
</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; font-family: '宋体';">Comparison between </span><span><a href="http://www.mp3do.com/"><span style="color: #0000ff; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline; font-size: 14pt; font-family: '宋体';">MP3 and WMA</span></a></span><span style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; font-family: '宋体';"> </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">According to what Microsoft said that WMA of 64kbps has the same quality as MP3 of 128kbps </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">when it is compressed by WMP7. However, when used WMP8 for compression, WMA will as good </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">as MP3 of 128kbps when its bit rate is only at 48kbps. Actually, WMA do not have such effect </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">though it has advanced technology. We discovered the following things after comparing these </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">two formats:</span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">1. </span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">Under the same data rate, like 128kbps, WMA does better than MP3 in quality;</span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">2. </span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">Under low data rate, fidelity of WMA is much higher than that of MP3. When the bit rate is </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">64kbps, quality of WMA is almost the same as it is when its bit rate is at 128kbps. But things </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">is totally different in MP3. When a song of WMA format at 32kbps</span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> </span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">can be heard, MP3 of the same bit rate can&#8217;t.</span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">3.</span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">MP3 is absolutely a very successful calculating way. It is can be heard when its bit rate </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">reaches 128kbps and its quality can become great when using </span><span><a href="http://www.mp3do.com/tips/content/which-best-terms-mp3-cbr-vs-abr-vs-vbr-vs-preset"><span style="color: #0000ff; text-decoration: underline; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">VBR</span></a></span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> compression of bit rate above 128kbps. But the data rate limit of MP3 is 128kbps, if bit rate </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">is lower than this number, the effect will be decreased a lot.</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"><br />
</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">In a word, WMA mainly improve playback of high-frequency signal under very low data rate. When the </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">bit rate is higher than 128kbps, it has no advantage over MP3 and its high-frequency distortion is </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">very serious. But WMA is a best choice for compressing English listening materials.</span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">One thing you </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">should remember in mind is that MP3 of 128kbps is better than WMA of 64kbps and even much better </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">than 48kbps, for treble part of song played in WMA format has metallic sound&#8211;larger distortion.</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"><br />
</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">Uncompressed WMA format is the best, but songs of WMA formats downloaded from internet are </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">compressed. That is why they sound not as good as MP3. Below 128kbps, WMA and MP3 nearly have no </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">differences but it takes advantage over MP3 for the file is smaller. However when bit rate is </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">above 128kbps or larger, MP3 is better than WMA.</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"><br />
</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">There are a lot of arguments about which is better between WMA and MP3. Both of them are lossy </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">compression encoding formats and have their own merits. Technically, WMA is better than MP3 in </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">its low bit rate. When bit rate is lower than 128kbps, WMA is the best. The lower bit rate is, </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">the better of WMA you will feel. And with streaming playing support, WMA is a very popular </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">format used on the internet. If your computer is tight on disk space and you demand higher sound quality,</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">WMA is no doubt a best choice. When bit rate is increase to 128k, WMA is the best among all levels of </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">lossy encoding formats. But when it comes to MP3, high-frequency is obviously lost. It seems that 128k </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">is a turning point, when the bit rate is upper, the acoustic fidelity does not change a lot. When bit </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">rate comes to 192kbps, MP3 will become a little better than WMA in quality. So if your computer has </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">enough capacity and you have higher requirement on audio quality, then you should choose MP3 of high </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">bit rate (from 192kbps-320kbps). But encoder&#8217;s selection is also important. </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"><br />
</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">MP3 is a smaller size file of compression rate of 1:10 or even 1:12 by using audio compression </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">technology, which can maintain finer acoustic fidelity. WMA is an audio compression format developed </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">by microsoft, which is later , smaller and better than MP3. The biggest difference between these two </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">formats is that standard of WMA is made by Microsoft while MP3 is an open criteria without copyright </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';">problem, which makes it more popular than WMA.</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: '宋体';"> </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.touchupsoft.com/ComputerTricks/differences-between-mp3-and-wma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 Great Events of 2009 Software Industry</title>
		<link>http://www.touchupsoft.com/ComputerTricks/make-an-inventory-of-2009-software-industry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.touchupsoft.com/ComputerTricks/make-an-inventory-of-2009-software-industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 09:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.touchupsoft.com/ComputerTricks/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the beginning of 2010, let’s review what great events happened in the software industry in 2009, so that we can keep to the developing thread in 2009 to predict the development in 2010.
Oracle Bought Sun
  On April 20 2009, Oracle bought Sun at about $7.4 billion. This was a heavyweight enterprise merger case [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US">At the beginning of 2010, let’s review what great events happened in the software industry in 2009, so that we can keep to the developing thread in 2009 to predict the development in 2010.</span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US">Oracle Bought Sun</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"> <!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]--></span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"> <!--[endif]-->On April 20 2009, </span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: blue;" lang="EN-US"><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8008246.stm"><span style="color: blue;">Oracle bought Sun</span></a></span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"> </span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体;" lang="EN-US">at about $7.4 billion. This was a heavyweight enterprise merger case in the global IT industry of 2009.<span style="color: black;"><br />
</span></span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;"> <span lang="EN-US"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US">Now, this event is still in development and there are continual trace and observation for this news event. Although the American authority has approved this merger case which was expected to be finished in August 2009, this merger is still blocked in the EU.<br />
</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;"> <span lang="EN-US"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US">The main worry the EU has with this case is from the open source database software MySQL which will be acquired together with Sun by Oracle. The open source community is worried about Oracle will affect the development of MySQL after Oracle owns MySQL in the future and impair the competition in database software market.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US">Although this event happened in 2009, its real impact on the IT industry I’m afraid will begin in 2010. As the result of this merger case clearer in 2010, it will be a great IT event that deserve much attention in 2010.<br />
</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;"> <span lang="EN-US"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US">Some reading for you:</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"><a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Gardner/?p=2903">Oracle Acquisition of Sun Makes Perfect Sense</a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"><a href="http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/tech-manager/?p=1197">What does the Oracle-Sun News Mean for Enterprise CTOs?</a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"><a href="http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/04/20/oracle-sun-good-news-bad-news-for-google-and-microsoft/">Oracle Sun: Good News, Bad News for Google and Microsoft</a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"><span> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><strong><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US">Microsoft’s Search Made a Leap Forward</span></strong><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"><br />
</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;"> <span lang="EN-US"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US">On June 4 2009, Microsoft’s <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/29/technology/internet/29bing.html">search engine Bing</a> was launched.<br />
</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;"> <span lang="EN-US"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US">In 2009, Microsoft invested much in search engine market embodied in:</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt; line-height: 12pt;"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"><span>1.<span style="font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;"> </span></span></span><!--[endif]--><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US">Launching the search engine Bing</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt; line-height: 12pt;"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"><span>2.<span style="font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;"> </span></span></span><!--[endif]--><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US">Signing the search ads cooperative agreement with Yahoo</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US">The two pieces of news looks like unrelated but in fact both served for Microsoft’s search business.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US">Bing is a great substitute in the field of search engine core and the ads cooperation with Yahoo is to promote the market share and ads revenue of Bing, which are two strategies prepared for each other.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US">Indeed, Microsoft’s Bing deserves Google’s fear. Firstly, the performance of Bing is not bad compared with Google; even some innovated features of Bing like image search also worth Google’s tension judging from our observation in the past half year. Secondly, it was showed in a market investigation report that after Bing was launched, Yahoo got converging attack from Google and Bing though Google’s market share was not affected, so Yahoo had to cooperate with Microsoft for the long run.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"><span> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US">Some reading for you:</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"><a href="http://searchengineland.com/microsoft-search-marketing-vs-google-search-marketing-beta-11261">Microsoft Search Marketing Vs Google Search Marketing</a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"><a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/090729-074504">It&#8217;s Official: Microsoft and Yahoo! Finally Strike Search Deal</a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"><a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9141024/Cloud_computing_Which_IT_projects_are_right_for_the_cloud_">Which IT Projects Are Right for the Cloud</a> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><strong><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US">Cloud Computing</span></strong><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US">Cloud computing could be regarded as the most loudly slogan in 2009. As the march of time and the development of IT, there are more content to talk about for cloud, but in terms of the basic concept, I really can not find any difference it has from the ASP (Application Service Provider) in ten years ago and the Web services popular a few years ago.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US">Perhaps, cloud computing is just a buzzword of IT industry and there will be other slogans as time passes by just like the Web 2.0 in a few years ago which is not talked about now but the content which referred to at that time is still evolving.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent: 21pt; line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;"> <span lang="EN-US"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US">No matter the past Web 2.0 or the current cloud computing, after trace to the source, what we need to understand are theses questions: What changes does the Internet bring to the personal consumer and the enterprise? How many daily things will we do on Internet (including mobile Internet) in the future? How will the paradigm of IT change from the PC terminal to the Internet? We had these questions when the Internet came in more than a decade ago and so are us now and in the future no matter what the popular slogan is.<br />
<!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]--></span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"> <!--[endif]--></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US">Some reading for you:</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"><a href="http://cloudcomputing.sys-con.com/node/579826">What is Cloud Computing?</a> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"><a href="http://news.zdnet.co.uk/itmanagement/0,1000000308,39973688,00.htm">Smaller firms take a shine to cloud computing</a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"><a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9141024/Cloud_computing_Which_IT_projects_are_right_for_the_cloud_">Which IT Projects Are Right for the Cloud</a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent: 21pt; line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;"> <span lang="EN-US"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><strong><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US">Google Revealed Chrome OS</span></strong><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"><br />
<!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]--></span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"><!--[endif]--> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US">In November 2009, Google revealed Chrome OS and will directly confront Microsoft in 2010.<br />
<!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]--></span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"> <!--[endif]--></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US">It was definite a great event for the global IT industry that Google released Chrome OS, since it is widely believed that besides Apple, Google is the most capable company in the world to compete with Microsoft, especially in software field. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US">Certainly, it has brought big anticipation for the IT industry that Google is entering the PC OS market, so there have been constant analyses and rumors for Google. It is reported that the Chrome OS netbook would come into the market in the middle of 2010. However, I would like to forecast that Chrome OS is incapable to compete with Microsoft in terms of a short time for I’m afraid the real product challenge will just begin in 2010 and we should consider the influence of Chrome OS in the long run.<br />
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US">Some reading for you</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;">： <span lang="EN-US"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5310406/giz-explains-what-the-hells-google-chrome-os">What the Hell&#8217;s Google Chrome OS</a> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"><a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/computers/?p=1103&amp;tag=content;col1">Will Chrome Netbooks Really Be Competitive?</a> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><strong><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><strong><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US">Windows 7 Was Launched</span></strong><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"><br />
<!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]--></span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"><!--[endif]--> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US">In October 2009, Windows was launched with the help of hundred computer manufacturers.<br />
</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;"> <span lang="EN-US"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US">Two years after the launch of Windows Vista which has been fed up with criticisms, users finally got a decent new choice. From the subsequent report and investigation data, we know Windows 7 do get more popularity than Vista, but there were critics who deemed the good of Win 7 not really very good but just built on the lousy Vista.<br />
<!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]--></span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"> <!--[endif]--></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US">According to what Microsoft and PC manufacturers said, the native support for multi-touch of windows 7 will bring innovation for the PC design and application. In 2010 the year for Windows 7 to get into market mainstream, let’s watch to see whether Windows 7 will really be the motivity of the industry innovation. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US">Some reading for you:</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"><a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/windows/microsoft-windows-7-professional/4505-3672_7-33704140.html?tag=contentMain;contentBody">Windows 7 Review</a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"><a href="http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Windows/Microsoft-Pushes-Tablet-PCs-Windows-7-at-CES-But-Not-Mobile-860893/">Microsoft Pushes Tablet PCs Windows 7 at CES But Not Mobile</a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"><a href="http://www.techradar.com/news/software/operating-systems/62-windows-7-tips-tricks-and-secrets-643861">62 Windows 7 Tips, Tricks and Secrets</a> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;" lang="EN-US"><br />
</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 宋体; color: black;"> <span lang="EN-US"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: black;" lang="EN-US"><a href="http://www.techradar.com/news/software/operating-systems/62-windows-7-tips-tricks-and-secrets-643861"></a> </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.touchupsoft.com/ComputerTricks/make-an-inventory-of-2009-software-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

